KAEDAH PENYELIDIKAN DALAM SAINS SOSIAL

Adèr, H. J., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Hand, D. J. (2008). Advising on research methods: a consultant’s companion. Huizen: Johannes van Kessel Publishing. ISBN 978-90-79418-01-5.

Al-Mahmood, A., Rashid, Md. A. & Islam, Md. S. (2011, Nov 25). Correlational research design. https://www.slideshare.net/mahmoodttc/correlational-research-design-10326627

Ang, K. H. (2016). Pengenalan rangkakerja metodologi dalam kajian penyelidikan: satu kajian kes. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 1(1), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v1i4.30

Anpar Research (2021, May 22). Pros and cons of qualitative research vs quantitative research. https://www.anparresearchltd.com/post/pros-and-cons-of-qualitative-research-vs-quantitative-research

Berg, B. L. & Howard, L. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. (8th ed). USA: Pearson Educational Inc.

Bhandari, P. (2021, July 7). An introduction to correlational research. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/correlational-research/

Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. New York: Oxford University Press

Cheprasov, A. (2018, January 4). What is a correlational study? - definition & examples. https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-a-correlational-study-definition-examples.html

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. (7th ed). London: Routledge.

Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Creswell, J. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. (3rd ed). California: SAGE Publication

Devault, G. (2020, December 5). Advantages and disadvantages of quantitative research. https://www.thebalancesmb.com/quantitative-research-advantages-and-disadvantages-2296728

Fischler A. S. (n.d.). Qualitative Research methods. School of Education. NOVA, South Eastern University.

Fraser Health Authority (2011). Quantitative research methods and tools. http://www.fraserhealth.ca/media/2011_11_14_Quantitative-Research-Methods-and-Tools.pdf.

Gay, L., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the debate. Integrative psychological and behavioral science, 42(3), 266-290.

Gorard, S. (2001). Quantitative methods in educational research: The role of numbers made easy. London: The Tower Building.

Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research, qualitative, quantitative and mixed approach. (4th ed). California: SAGE Publication.

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (p. 34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.

Leedy P.D. & Ormrod J.E. (2010) Practical Research: Planning and Design. (9th ed). Pearson Educational International, Boston

Lichtman, M. (2013). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. (3rd ed). USA: SAGE Publication.

Lodico, M., Spaulding, D., & Voegtle, K. (2006). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

McLeod, S. (2019). What’s the difference between qualitative and quantitative research? https://www.simplypsychology.org/qualitative-quantitative.html

QuestionPro Products (n.d.). What is a Survey –Defi nition, templates,methods, characteristics,and examples. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/surveys/

Shank, G. & Brown, L. (2007). Exploring Educational Research Literacy. New York: Routledge.

Sukamolson, S. (2007). Fundamentals of quantitative research. Language Institute Chulalongkorn University, 1-20.

Taiwo, E. & Faw, K. (n.d.). Correlational design. https://douglasfleming.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/0/5/1305380/correlation_research_design_presentation_kieran_and______emmanuel.pdf

Volt, W. (1999). Dictionary of statistics and methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Williams, C. (2011). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 5(3).

Boddy, C. (2012). The nominal group technique: An aid to brainstorming ideas in research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 15, 6–18.

Delbecq,A., deVanVen,A., & Gustafson, D. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company

Hamid, B.H. (2015), Continuous Improvement CSF framework for assessing ci maturity in ISO and non-ISO certified construction contracting organizations. Thesis Faculty of Technology Management and Business Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia

Mohd Jamil MR, Siraj, S, Hussin, Z., Mat Noh, & Sapar, NA (2014), Pengenalan Asas Keadah Fuzzy Delphi Dalam Penyelidikan Rekabentuk Pembangunan. Minda Intelek Agency, Bangi Selangor

Mohd Ridhuan, M.J., Shariza, S., & Mohd Ibrahim, K. A. (2014). Kompetensi Guru Terhadap Pengurusan Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran: Suatu Pendekatan Teknik Fuzzy Delphi. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 1(3), 77–88

Mustapha, R., & Darulsalam, G. (2018). Aplikasi kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalam penyelidikan Sains Sosial. Universiti Malaya Press.

Mullen, P. (2003). Delphi: Myths and reality. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 17(1), 37–52.

Needham, R., & Loë, R. (1990). The policy Delphi: Purpose structure and application. Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien, 34(1), 133–142.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R a nd Aouad, G., Hinks, J., Sexton, M.G. and Sheath, D.M., (1998),A generic guide to the design and construction process protocol , University of Salford,Salford

Krauss, S. E. (2005). Research Paradigms and Meaning Making: A Primer. The Qualitative Report, 10(4), 758-770. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1831

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

Kulatunga U, Amaratunga D, Haigh R, Rameezdeen R. (2006). Attitudes and perceptionsof construction workforce on construction waste in Sri Lanka. Management ofEnvironmental Quality: An International Journal; 17:57–72.

Lu, S and Sexton, M G (2004). Appropriate research design for investigating innovation in small knowledge-intensive professional service firms. In: Khosrowshahi, F (Ed.), Proceedings 20th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2004, Edinburgh, UK. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Vol. 2, 733–9.

Mohd Najib, A. G. (2003). Reka bentuk tinjauan soal selidik pendidikan. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Morgan, David. (2007). Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained: Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 1. 48-76. 10.1177/2345678906292462.

Plano Clark, V.L. and Creswell, J.W. (2008) The Mixed Methods Reader. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

Polit, D. F., & Hungler, B. F. (1997). Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal, and Utilization (4th ed.). Michigan: Lippincott-Raven.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2003). Research Methods for Business Students (3rdEdition), Harlow: Pearson Education Limited

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2007), Research methods for business students, 5th ed., Essex: Pearson Education Limited

Senaratne, S and Sexton, M (2004) The methodological framework for a research study on the role of knowledge in managing construction project change. In the proceedings of 4th International postgraduate research conference, University of Salford, April 2004.

Sexton, M G (2003) A supple approach to exposing and challenging assumptions and path dependencies in research. Keynote Speech of the 3rd International Postgraduate Research Conference, Lisbon, April 2003

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Teddlie, C. and Tashakkori, A. (2009) Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage, London.

Bhattacherjee, Anol, “Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices” (2012). Textbooks Collection. 3.

Chua, Y. P. (2012). Mastering research methods. Shah Alam: McGraw-Hill Education Asia.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

Gill, J., Johnson, P. & Clark, M. (2010). Research methods for managers. SAGE Publications

Lammers, W. J, & Badia, P. (2005). Fundamentals of behavioral research. Wadsworth: Belmont, CA.

PKS (2016), Laporan Tahunan PKS 2015-2016, SME Report.

Taherdoost, H., (2016), Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research, International Journal of Academic Research in Management, vol 5 (2).

Wilson, J. (2010). Essentials of business research: a guide to doing your research project. SAGE Publication.

Zikmund, W. G. (2002). Business research methods, Dryden. Thomson Learning.

Adler, M., & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the Oracle. Jessica Kingsley Publishers: Bristol, PA.

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspectives and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Charan, P. Shankar, R & Baisya, R. K. (2008). Analysis of Interactions Among the Variables of Supply Chain Performance Measurement System Implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 14(4), 512-529.

Dalkey, N. C., & Helmert, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467.

Georgakopoulos, A. (2009). Teacher Effectiveness Examined as a System: Interpretive Structural Modelling and Facilitation Sessions with US and Japanese Students. International Education Studies, 2(3), 60.

Janes, F. R. (1988). Interpretive Structural Modeling: A Methodology for Structuring Complex Issues. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control,10(3),145-154.

Mihram, G. A. (1972). Simulation: Statistical Foundations and Methodology (Vol.11). New York: Academic Press.

Parente, R. J., Hiob, T. N., Silver, R. A., Jenkins, C., Poe, M. P., & Mullins, R. J. (1994). The Delphi Method, Impeachment and Terrorism: Accuracies of Short- Range Forecasts for Volatile World Events. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(4), 401-411.

Porter, A. L., Rossini, F.A., Carpenter, S. R., & Roper, A. T. (1980). A Guide Book for Technology Assessment and Impact Analysis. New York: North Holland.

Ravi, V.,& Shankar, R.(2005). Analysis of Interactions Among the Barriers of Reverse Logistics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(8), 1011-1029.

Sage, A. P. (1977). Interpretive Structural Modeling: Methodology for Large-Scale Systems. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T.,& Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi Method for Graduate Research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6(1).

Warfield, J. N. (1973). Intent Structures. IEEE Trans on System, Man and Cybeni, SMC3(2), 133-140.

Warfield, J. N. (1974). Structuring Complex System. Battelle Monograph No.4, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus. Ohio, USA.

Warfield, J. N. (1976). Societal Systems: Planning, Policy and Complexity. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York, USA.

Warfield, J. N., & Perino, G.H. (1999). The Problematique: Evolution of an Idea. System Research and Behavioral Science, 16(3), 221-226.